Trent Palmer’s FAA Case Update: Protecting Pilot Freedoms

Hi, friends! If you’re part of the aviation community, you’re probably familiar with pilot and YouTuber Trent Palmer’s ongoing FAA case. Recently, Trent shared important updates and reflections on his legal journey, which has significant implications for pilots everywhere. Let’s dive into what happened, why it matters, and how it might impact all of us who love to fly.

Trent Palmer, a well-known pilot and YouTube personality, recently provided an important update on his longstanding legal battle with the FAA, shedding light on significant implications for aviation freedom and pilot rights.

Four years ago, Palmer made a low inspection pass at a friend’s backyard landing site, which neighbors reported to the FAA, triggering a prolonged legal conflict. Palmer initially appealed the FAA’s proposed 120-day suspension, citing concerns over inadequate evidence and potential implications for pilot freedoms. Despite presenting strong appeals supported by organizations like AOPA, EAA, and the Alaskan Airmen’s Association, along with backing from U.S. Senators, the Ninth Circuit Court ultimately ruled against him.

Palmer emphasized that his main concern was never the suspension itself, which he has already served without major issues, but rather the dangerous precedent his case might set. His case raised critical issues regarding due process and the FAA’s administrative power, particularly concerning the FAA regulation 91.119, which mandates pilots maintain at least 500 feet of distance from structures except during necessary landing and takeoff maneuvers.

The case highlighted troubling elements, including the FAA inspector’s lack of concrete evidence beyond low-quality video footage. Additionally, Palmer’s case illustrated broader judicial concerns, such as the controversial practice of administrative law judges (ALJs) deferring unquestioningly to the FAA rather than serving as independent checks on regulatory power—a concern linked to ongoing debates about the Chevron Doctrine.

Since Palmer’s ruling, similar cases have emerged, raising fears about how the FAA interprets and enforces its regulations. For instance, a Massachusetts floatplane pilot faces a comparable situation for performing standard landing and takeoff procedures near a bridge, leading to potential penalties. Palmer points out this as a troubling trend possibly influenced by the precedent his case set.

Despite setbacks, some progress was made through the “Backcountry Aviation Protection Act,” which explicitly protects necessary steps like go-arounds, missed approaches, and inspection passes during landing procedures. Additionally, FAA rules can no longer compel pilots to complete landings deemed unsafe.

Reflecting on the ordeal, Palmer advises pilots involved in FAA investigations to consult legal counsel early to avoid inadvertently compromising their position. He underscores that while most FAA personnel are supportive, unfortunate encounters with adversarial inspectors can escalate unnecessarily.

Palmer encourages continued support for aviation advocacy groups like AOPA and EAA, which tirelessly defend pilots’ rights. He concluded by thanking his supporters, noting their significant role in bringing attention to critical aviation freedom issues.

Palmer remains optimistic, focusing now on future endeavors and aviation events like Sun and Fun, maintaining his commitment to advocating for pilots and aviation freedoms.

As an aviation enthusiast, Part 107 licensed drone operator, and former student pilot, I fully support and agree with Trent Palmer’s efforts. If you share our passion for protecting aviation freedoms, I encourage you to join aviation advocacy groups like AOPA and EAA. Together, we can help safeguard the rights and freedoms of pilots everywhere.